HowardPolitics and Cosmic Radiation
March 18th 2010 10:26
Real Crash- Looking at Capitalism and its Laws:
Cosmic Rays
The old geezer is looking at politics and cosmic radiation. Cosmic radiation may seem to be an arcane topic, and a weak force. Yet things such as variations of cosmic radiation may play a key role in climate change (not man made forces) and other physical phenomena. Likewise, a small political force can change a much larger force by speaking clearly.
Says the geezer: The key for the subject of a task-orientation for the mastery of the subject of -cosmic radiation-- is located within the definitions of Riemannian physics already tackled by Vernadsky and Einstein, most emphatically, as, similarly, by my established definition of the subject-matter of a science of physical economy. This is a subject-matter which reflects that same domain of Riemannian physics, that at a time when the presently onrushing general economic breakdown-crisis of the planet, is already in progress. This scientific advance demands sweeping reforms in national economic policies, reforms which depend on following through on the pioneering by those scientific celebrities of the preceding century.
Riemann Against the Positivists
This proposition, being considered in the following pages, demands that we take action now, to assist in the success of such efforts to master the practical implications of cosmic radiation, both on Earth itself, and, more so across the reaches between Earth and Mars, and beyond that, now, by removing the obstacle to scientific progress represented, still today, by what errant mathematicians, such as by the late David Hilbert's radically reductionist proposition presented to the problems of mathematics then, as still today.
The essential feature of Hilbert's argument presents us with what should be considered as an artificial problem, much more than one inherent in competent scientific practice. Hilbert's problem was, actually, one whose very existence can be demonstrated to be located as merely a product of an -ivory tower- variety of conceit, a conceit whose subject lies in a fantasy-world outside the proper domain of physical science as such.
To understand that -ivory tower- scheme presented by the arguments of Hilbert, et al., the apparent difficulty is to be recognized as being a kind of mental disorder specifically related to the domain of dogmatic, a-priorist arithmetization of Euclid's Elements. The remedy for the delusion of Hilbert et al., is as Bernhard Riemann pointed to the nature of this systemic problem among mathematicians generally, as in his concluding sentence of his famous 1854 habilitation dissertation at Gottingen, and, as Riemann had already indicated thoughts in that direction in the two opening paragraphs of that same dissertation.
| 40 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
subscribe to this blog