Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Real Crash - by Howard

 
We can avoid nuclear war by putting the financial system into bankruptcy reorganization.Need Glass-Steagall Act, water projects, space program. Need a change to production, the real American System.

It Ain't Nothing but an Obama Party

Real Crash- Looking at the Financial System and the War Drive:
Obama as Osama
Obama as Osama



It ain't nothing but a Chicago Party;
Made for an Iraqi Auchi billionaire;
And the Obamas and Rezkos were there;
"Would you like a nice mansion?"
"Can you do me some favors?"
"Would you like to be President?"

They say it's your birthday.....

(spoof- Beatles- They say it's your Birthday)

The Dirt is coming out on Obama right on schedule. He said he did a bit of work for Tony Rezko, now on trial. Now it comes out at Rezko's Chicago trial that a witness states that the Obamas were at the Chicago house party, at Rezko's house, for Iraqi-British billionaire Auchi. The witness' name is Stuart Levine. That should be explosive, very soon.

Then Sean Hannity, a right-wing talk show host, has been been featuring the Obama connection to the unrepentant convicted terrorist Bill Ayres, now in the Chicago Quackedemic scene. London said they would never let Obama be President. I guess that's our president from our British Fairy Godmother. That's the British version of "the Godfather."
68
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      Glass-Steagall Fever Spreads 
      Elizabeth Warren Joins Glass Steagall 
      Google Twitter Facebook 
Comments
17 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]
1. April 15th 2008 @ 12:07. S.L. Says:
This doesn't surprise me, Howard. Obama is no more qualified than Hillary to become President. Their policies are almost identical, too. But I'm a little confused. It has sounded like you were in favor of electing Hillary. If the Brits don't want Obama, does that mean that they do want Hillary? And wouldn't supporting her play right into their hands?
2. April 15th 2008 @ 12:12. Howard Says:
Not really, because in a sense the London crowd want nobody for President. They want Chaos in the USA. One new (but old option) is to have party elders draft Al Gore (the buddy of Prince Charles!) as the Dem. nominee.
3. April 15th 2008 @ 12:19. S.L. Says:
After Hillary and Obama finish devouring each other, Gore might well be proposed as a possibility. Considering how politically correct and fashionable it is these days to buy into his Glo-bull Warming/ Cooling/ Climate Change crappola, he might have a chance at winning. There's a sickening thought.
4. April 15th 2008 @ 16:12. Proud American Says:
Listen, Obama may not have a lot of Washington experience, but the biggoted rants that people go on about him are related to fear and hate. The picture that you use, for example. This is an example of fear mongering. A picture of this nature could easily have been used on any of the other candidates visiting a foreign country, showing respect for local customs. There are relatively similar pics of John McCain and Hillary, as well as other Heads of State around the world. The reason this one is circulating is because of the underlying subtext that people are afraid he's a Muslim.

As for his connection with Rezko, Obama has been very open. Which is refreshing, considering the fact that most politicians are involved in so many shady dealings that they try like hell to cover up, that they literally get swept under the rug.

Obama is new and different, and to most people, that's scary. But, before towing the Sean Hannity line (who is pretty much a lauging stock in the U.S. on both sides of the aisle) it's important to learn the facts, study the candidate, and their policies.

And, if you say that you don't care enough to research the candidates, that's fine. But, to post damaging and misleading info without due diligence is harmful to everyone.
5. April 15th 2008 @ 16:29. Don Lee Says:
Sorry to intrude here, but Barak Obama doesn't have enough experience for the job he has. He shows contempt for everyone who isnt rich and elite (like himself) and he listens to a preacher who makes a point of race baiting and hating his country. The same country that gives him the right to preach hate. He wasnt very nice to his own grandmother and called her a typical white person, forgetting the fact that he's half white. Hes chummy with a known terrorist and wants to talk to our enemies instead of fighting them. He likes partial birth abortion and doesnt want any survivors to be saved. His voting record sucks. His new "hope" is nothing but a digging up of long dead, failed policies with a little extra socialism thrown in. His wife is ashamed of this country, too. She made a point of saying so. Don' blame me or anyone else for bringing race into this issue. He would be a lousy candidate no matter what color his skin is, and hes the one who always brings it up (like his wife and his preacher do).

6. April 15th 2008 @ 16:53. Natalie 2 Says:
I really have to disagree with most of the sentiments here. All of this talk about Barack being elitist, his wife not being proud of america. These are the talking points of the hateful right-wing radio hosts. I'm not trying to start an argument, I just want to say that I am a lady from the midwest with a modest income, and I have met the man. He is kind, genuine, and proud of his country.

It's easy to forget with all of the rhetoric that's flying around that he came from humble beginnings and began his career as a community organizer, working in the poorest communities.

And, I in no way think he threw his white grandmother under the bus. I think he was making a very valid point that when it comes to race, even some of those people we cherish the most have said and done things that we don't agree with. Does that mean that we should denounce them as human beings or try to change their minds and still love them? This was his point, and I think it was pretty obvious.

Also, to the point of Barack being the one to "always bring it up" regarding his race, this is factually inaccurate. He was trying NOT to make race an issue for the entire first year of his campaign, until it became clear that there is a segment of the population that is uncomfortable with race relations, a fact was exploited by his opponents, and he finally had to address it. Barack Obama has never called anyone a racist.
7. April 15th 2008 @ 17:18. S.L. Says:
So, what you're saying is that his wife didn't really say what she said on camera? And you don't believe that his pastor really said "God damn America" and he didn't mean anything by it when he referred to his grandmother as a "typical white person?" And now he's trying to use his race as an excuse for everything disagreeable that he and his followers say? That's just silly. He may seem like something of a hero because he makes a pretty good speech, but the substance is completely absent. His ideas are vague at best and downright ridiculous at worst. He makes his inadequacy clearer every time he opens his mouth.

This has nothing to do with race. Personally, there are several black candidates I would vote for, happily. Because they are qualified for the job, not because of their skin color. Those who don't like the fact that some people are against Hillary or Obama tend to use race or gender as the reason. Most of us who oppose them do so for philosophical reasons. Their politics are not what is best for this country and some people don't want to be bullied into approving of unacceptable candidates due to their sex or skin color.
8. April 15th 2008 @ 19:40. Howard Says:
It's my party and I' ll cry if I want to? Ha.

Seriously, Mr. Obama has a lot of negatives, and despite his nice rhetoric he has NO policy at all. Unlike Hillary and her mortgage foreclosure freeze, Mr. O. does not even claim to have a policy. So he is worthless to everyone.
9. April 15th 2008 @ 23:48. Natalie 2 Says:
The exception that I take in particular is to the use of the picture in this post. This picture has been used to speculate about his religious affiliations, and it's so absurd, it just seems wrong to use it at all.

I am aware of his wife's quote, and it didn't offend me in the least. Because it has been so twisted and taken out of context. Most people, even those who are not for Obama, seem to have pretty firm grasp of what she was saying, which is that in her ADULT lifetime, this is the first time she's been REALLY proud of her country. Meaning that yes, America has historically done some wonderful things that we should all be proud of, but in the last 20 years, we have seen a gradual downward spiral, and are losing our standing in the world. People have become more and more cynical, and, for the first time in a very long time, many Americans are rallying behind a cause that they believe in. At the end of the day, you cannot know Mrs. Obama's heart, and all you are left with are her words. Yes, she made that statement, but she has also said since the beginning that she is proud to live in a country that has given her opportunities she has seen nowhere else. This whole conversation is pointless, however, because Sean Hannity and the like are pouding this rhetoric home daily, and people buy it.

The Rev. Wright thing is so hard for me to swallow, because it really disappoints me how fickle people are. People love to see good people fall, it's human nature, I guess. I challenge you to listen to the Rev.'s sermon in it's entirety. The one where he says , "God Damn America." You will see the whole meaning behind what he says. He's a preacher, for Pete's Sake! America has done some pretty awful things, and I think most preachers would agree that they have not been done to glorify God. Historically, preachers have talked about damnation in the face of unrepentant wickedness, and I guess your opinion of wickedness when it comes to the deeds America has been involved in of late just depends on where you stand on the issues of war, etc.

As far as the substance behind Barack Obama's speeches, he has specific plans laid out for every proposal he has made, and you can find them all on his web site.

At this point, I would like to say that I am just trying to engage in a healthy debate here. I just don't want anyone to think I'm attacking them. I get very passionate about this topic, but I'm not in the business of making enemies over it. If there's one thing that the election of 2008 has done, it has gotten people on both sides of the aisle more involved than they have been in a long time. I am happy to see so many people showing an interest in politics.

I sincerely apologize if anything I have said here has come across as snarky. It was not intended to be, and if anything I've said offends, I'm very sorry. It's probably important to note that I'm not a raging, bleeding heart liberal. I'm a moderately conservative granddaughter of a Lutheran minister, and he and I just happen to believe that Barack Obama is just the breath of fresh air America needs right now. I'll stop filling up your comments section now!
10. April 15th 2008 @ 23:53. Howard Says:
Impressive! But you have to remember the Bob Dylan song, you gotta serve somebody. Mr. O. ain't serving the devil or the lord , so fuggedaboutit...

Mr. O.'s program is about issues that don't exist.
11. April 16th 2008 @ 06:58. Natalie 2 Says:
I guess my question when people make claims like that...that he serves no one, or that he doesn't serve someone in particular...I just wonder where that comes from? Senator Obama has done wonderful things in his life for people. People who genuinely needed help, an advocate, and continue to reap the benefits to this day. So how can you flatly say that he serves no one?

To disagree with him is one thing. To stand opposed to someone is fine. But to say that he only serves issues that don't exist is rather insulting to me, as he speaks pointedly to issues that exist in a very palpable sense in my life.

For example, if a candidate is against universal health care, I can disagree with that stance without disregarding the very real emotion behind the issue. I wouldn't claim that he or those that are inclined to agree with him are basing their philosophy on nothing at all. I would have to respect the fact that they see things differently than I do.

I'm sorry, but I just don't get the claim that he stands for nothing, or that his issues "don't exist". Perhaps I am ignorant, but I just don't get it. It comes off as rhetoric designed to discredit someone, rather than an opposing view point. Just my $.02.
12. April 19th 2008 @ 15:35. RubySoho Says:
So what is this "London" crowd then? That's one conspiracy theory I'm yet to hear about...
13. April 19th 2008 @ 19:07. Howard Says:
The City of London financial center, along with the offshore "pirate" operations like Cayman Is, Bahamas, Bermuda, and various Dutch enclaves, etc. control the US Dollar. See my latest post.

They do this in the name of the super-rich who are "above" nation-states. The British Empire has always been horrible, but they "revived from the dead" with the floating of the dollar and deregulation of the 1970s and 1980s. Now under the World Trade Org, we are finished. Better to destroy the WTO and shut down the British system.
14. April 19th 2008 @ 19:08. Howard Says:
for more on this see larouchepac.
15. April 20th 2008 @ 01:28. RubySoho Says:
Oh no, you're Larouche? This is where I make a hasty exit. Good luck.
16. April 20th 2008 @ 03:01. Howard Says:
Hey Ruby Tuesday. Just because you don't like LaRouche doesn't mean you have to bow down to the London crowd. Do you want your life run from the Cayman Islands? How are your Auction-backed securities doing? (frozen forever). Don't you want to put the bubble into bankruptcy? Save the cheated on homeowners now being foreclosed? Drop the PC atitude honey, it's the ice age, you know?
17. April 20th 2008 @ 04:38. RubySoho Says:
You're rather funny. I quite like you but the whole LaRouche movement thing freaks me out. So far to the right, it seems like it is turning around and coming back again. Scary.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
13 Posts
23 Posts
29 Posts
1372 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Howard
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]